So last night was Green Mountain College’s performance of The Vagina Monologues.  Because GMC kids are totally badass though, they added other monologues.  My sister, who performed “My Vagina was my Village,” called me a month or so ago and asked if she could also read something I had written a year or two back about asexuality.  I said yes.  It’s something I wrote for my college health class, and it’s about the slow process of figuring out I’m ace.  This is what my sister read last night:

           Age thirteen.  I am sitting snuggled closely with my four best friends on one of their beds.  In that cool, dusty basement bedroom, we are reading passages of a romance novel aloud, passing the book to the next girl when the reader collapses into giggles.  I giggle, not understanding.  It’s funny, I suppose, though it seems kind of gross.  I suppose I will understand when I am older.

            Age fifteen.  I am sitting at my kitchen table, reading Dear Abby in the newspaper, a break from school before I begin my homework.  A girl my age has written in, saying she feels left behind by her friends, by their incomprehensible interest in boyfriends and sex.  I read ahead eagerly to Abby’s response – perhaps she has the answer to what’s different about me.  Abby says not to worry, that we are only “late bloomers.”  I am disappointed.  I suppose I will understand when I am older.

            Age seventeen.  I am sitting on the couch in my family room with my three closest friends.  It is the last summer of us; we all leave for college in the fall.  I am listening to all their stories about the boys they’ve dated, the boys they’ve fooled around with, the boys they’ve slept with.  I am the only virgin left in the group.  They reassure me, telling me my time will come.  I do not tell them that I never want it to come, because that feeling bothers me.  I am beginning to seriously worry now that something has gone terribly wrong with me; that I am somehow broken inside.  Suppose I do not understand when I am older?

            Age nineteen.  I am sitting on my bed in my college dorm room, left alone by my now ex-boyfriend.  Although the break-up itself went better than I expected, I am still deeply disturbed, worried for myself.  It was the idea of sex that killed this short-lived relationship.  My hatred of his touch had seeped into every interaction I had with him.  Something must be seriously wrong with me.  How can it be that something that comes so naturally to everyone else is so repulsive to me, only to me?  Suppose I still do not understand, though now I am older?

            Age nineteen.  I am sitting on the worn couch in the common room, on the phone with my friend who transferred, trying to explain to her why I had to break up with the boy she was so eager for me to date.  She asks if I have ever considered that I might be asexual.  I tell her, I’ve joked with that word for ages, it doesn’t mean anything.  She tells me, it does.  She tells me, Google it.  I hang up, and I do just that.  Suppose I may never have to understand when I am older?

            Age nineteen.  I am sitting on the common room couch still, hungrily reading the entire content of a website called AVEN: Asexuality Visibility and Education Network.  I suddenly suppose that I will never understand, no matter how old I get.

            Age nineteen.  I am sitting tall, resting a new confidence on a new identity.  Asexuality.  I suppose I understand myself, now that I am older.

Brainy is the new sexy.: So I met someone else who IDs as asexual in real life! →

saneoldsameold:

duskandshiverrrr:

saneoldsameold:

dandelionroots:

I was working for this woman on her farm, and we ended up talking about politics/feminism/activism/etc after she found out I had majored in women’s studies. She mentioned that a lot of her friends call her a “man-hater” because she has no interest in dating or remarrying. She…

Oh so I met someone online who’s pretty much perfect for me and this reminded me of her because she’s asexual.

Anyway I might ask her out but I’m just a really sexual person and I dunno how to appropriately ask about how she likes relationships to function. I mean, I know there’s a spectrum from aversive asexuality to people OKAY with but not very into sex, with tons of shades of gray like any other sexual spectrum.

How do you think one should go about discussing this? It’s a bit soon for this convo but it’s nice to see asexuals in lovely relationships!!!!

I don’t think Abi will mind too much if I jump in here. I’m grey-asexual and she’s ace and she’s my platonic girlfriend. =)

There are plenty of asexuals who love sex. Being asexual simply means that one does not experience sexual attraction. It has no bearing on libido, or enjoyment of sex, or kinks. It’s just a lack of sexual attraction.

My relationship with Abi kind of just happened. One day we were watching Supernatural and I said “I call you my platonic girlfriend” and she said “Okay” and it’s been like that ever since. My relationship with Simon—the romantic portion, at least—was similar. He and I are currently nonsexual. We kind of view it as, we might have sex, we might not. Whatever.

If it’s really really important for you to have sex in a relationship, don’t fret; she might be the same way. If she’s repulsed ace, she’s totally averse to sex (Abi described it as, remember when you’re nine and think sex is the grossest thing ever? That’s me, but twelve years older). I’d say just have a relationship with her and discuss the sex thing as it comes up, and be open to other ways of thinking and viewing sex. =)

Ah this is wonderful advice. Thanks so much for the advice and the info about asexuality! It was super informative :) And yeah, I think I’ll just take it as it comes up and if it ever does we can talk about it! Thanks again so much.

Jumping in here, because I read everything people add when they reblog me like a creep.  Anyway, Dusky said lots of good things, but I’d just like to add: I’m also in a relationship with a lovely young woman, M, who is my significant other or girlfriend or whathaveyou.  And M is a super-sexual person, and I am, as Dusky said, not in the least.  We mostly make it work because we’re an open, polyamorous relationship — she people that she spends time with and has sexy times with and I have my platonic girlfriend Dusky, and we make it work.  M describes polyamory as different kinds of intimacy with different people.  And maybe it’s not your thing, which is totally cool, and maybe it is, which is also totally cool.  I guess the main point is: communication is always going to be key, like in every relationship, about what each person wants and expects.  But basically, I’m glad you met someone so awesome, I really hope good things happen there!

So I met someone else who IDs as asexual in real life!

I was working for this woman on her farm, and we ended up talking about politics/feminism/activism/etc after she found out I had majored in women’s studies.  She mentioned that a lot of her friends call her a “man-hater” because she has no interest in dating or remarrying.  She said, “I tell them, I’m not gay, I’m not heterosexual, I’m asexual, I just don’t want any of it.”  And I, of course, got really excited, and said that I identify as asexual as well, and we ended up talking about it a little bit.  She asked me how that worked with my relationship with M, and if I had trouble finding people that had the same goals in a relationship as me, and about how I worked out my ideas about having a family in the future and everything.  It was a really good discussion, and I really don’t think she had ever met anyone else who said they were ace, or even that it was a real thing, so I felt like I did some good, somehow.

Dear Abby, Dear Abby, you won’t believe this: Abigail VanBuren writes on asexuality!

DEAR ABBY: I am a very feminine 23-year-old woman who lives at home with my father. I am completely uninterested in getting married or having children now or in the future. I don’t believe it’s the end of the world to be a woman and not want children, but my dad and my grandmother act as though I’m abnormal. Dad says he blames himself for “failing to raise me right.”

He also blames himself for the fact that I’m not interested in guys. The thought of being intimate with a guy is disgusting to me. I identify as mostly asexual, although I have had passing infatuations with women. Dad takes this personally like he is responsible for my desires, or lack thereof. Grandma is worse. She constantly makes excuses to my male friends about how I’m just “not ready yet” and that they should be “patient.”

Abby, I know nothing I say will change their minds, but is there something I can do to make them understand they didn’t fail? This is who I am. How can I end the guilt trip and keep the peace? — BORN THIS WAY IN NORTH CAROLINA

DEAR BORN THIS WAY: People who have no sexual feelings are asexual. People who are attracted to members of the same sex are gay, and they, too, are born that way. It has nothing to do with the way they are raised.

You cannot live your life trying to please your father and grandmother, and you have nothing to apologize for. If you need help explaining why you are the way you are, contact PFLAG (Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays), an organization that can provide you with literature that will explain it to them. You can find more information at www.pflag.org.

[So she didn’t get it exactly right — “no sexual feelings” =/= “do not experience sexual attraction to people of any gender” — but I still was really happy to see her write on it at all, and especially in a positive way.]

(Source: uexpress.com)

In which I desperately hope for things that (probably) won’t happen on television

So, as probably most people on tumblr know, BBC’s Sherlock began its second season yesterday.  It was very exciting all around.  Many ships were sailed from every quarter.  There was the usual bombardment of ‘Sherlock and John are clearly gay’ jokes, followed by the traditional denial by John.  Sherlock was revealed to be a virgin.  And someone who doesn’t even ship Sherlock and John said that she thought a lot of things in “A Scandal in Belgravia” were set up for them becoming canon.  And I thought about that and it blew my mind.

So Sherlock is canon asexual — unless I’m much mistaken, Moffat has used that word to describe him in interviews — and that impression was (I thought) very much reinforced by the new episode (even though they still haven’t used the word within the context of the dialogue itself, but that’s a whole other can of worms).  And John is canon straight.  And Moffat and Gatiss have both said that, fandom go ahead and do what you please, but their relationship is not sexual.  So what if they established Sherlock and John as a canon romantic nonsexual relationship?  (I honestly don’t think they will, for various reasons, and I only friendship/queerplatonic-ship them most of the time myself, but bear with me.)

IT WOULD BE AWESOME

I told my sister, in that hyperbolic way I have, that if that happened, I would “scream and cry and bash my head against a wall.”  And my father told me to “get a life.”  Fair enough.

But first, go to the TV tropes page on asexuality.  Look at the characters listed for live action television.  There are really very few listed, and a lot of it is speculation by fans and actors rather than actual canon or Word of God.  And most of them are aromantic as well.  As far as I can tell, there isn’t an established romantic nonsexual relationship anywhere on television.  And whether we like it or not, TV tells us a lot about what we value as a society, and also teaches us what we should value.  And until I thought about it, I didn’t realize how much it hurts that I have never seen the kind of relationship I would someday maybe like to have represented on TV.  It’s silly, maybe.  But it’s also maybe part of the reason why I didn’t figure out I was asexual until I was nineteen.  It’s a big part of that overall invisibility that folk who are asexual deal with every day.

In all honesty, I don’t think a romantic nonsexual relationship will become officially canon on Sherlock.  I think the writers enjoy playing that line between romance and friendship, and they like the flexibility it gives them with the fans and the audience, and hey it makes for a couple of good ~lol gay~ jokes every episode, so I think they’ll keep toeing the line.  But if they did it, I probably would cry.  Just to see that on TV, to see someone like me have a relationship like that —

It’d be fucking wonderful.

Asexuality Hotline!

festeringfae answered: Oh hey I found one! It’s a US hotline called “Strictly Asexuality” 215-525-3595 in case you want to share

THANK YOU.  This is awesome :)  In case you need it, folks.

ALSO

Does anyone have any/know where to find asexuality-related emergency resources?  Like hotlines or anything?

List of awesome ace-tastic tumblrs

These are just the ones I follow, and if anyone has suggestions, please add to the list!

I’m sure there’s more, I just have kinda been off the tumblr ace community radar recently, so add to the list?

December Asexy Linkspam →

(Source: greenchestnuts)

In defense of Taylor Swift: Why Virgin Shaming is Shitty and How Asexy Music is Hard to Find

Not so very long ago, I was sitting in the car with my mom, listening to the radio, and singing along like I do.  When the song was over, my mom gave me an odd look and asked what I thought the song was about.  I shrugged, and she said, “Well, because to me it’s about sex.  So I was just wondering why you liked it.”  And I just looked at her and said, “Pretty much every song is about sex.”  And she granted my point and we moved on and by ‘we’ I mean ‘she’ because I did not move on and I’ma blog about it because that is also how I do.  So what, you may ask, does Taylor Swift have to do with awkward assumptions about my music taste made by my mother?  Well, let me tell you.

So, I’m going to preface this by saying that I consider myself very much a feminist, and that I love Taylor Swift’s music immensely, and that, while I know her music is sometimes problematic, I do not see this as a contradiction of any sort.  ’Kay, now that we’ve established that.  The following are the most common complaints I hear about her music from other feminists:

  • She is slut shaming
  • She is heteronormative
  • She only sings about how she needs a man
  • She is playing the part of Virgin and thus perpetuating the Virgin/Whore dichotomy
  • She keeps her music non-sexual, which is either a) slut shaming or b) childish

The last two are my favorites, and by ‘favorites’ I mean ‘the ones that give me the greatest desire to punch things’ and I’ll talk about them most.  Here we go.

There is only one song of hers that I know of, “Better than Revenge,” that actually has slut shaming tones to it — “She’s not a saint and she’s not what you think/She’s an actress, whoa-oh/She’s better known for the things that she does on the mattress, whoa-oh.”  This is bad.  I do not like that song.  However, the rest of her music does not have lyrics with that tone.  They shame cheaters or people who are cruel or just generally talk about Feelings without shaming anyone.  So, yes, Taylor Swift, as a person, probably is not the world’s most sex-positive being.  That does not mean all her music is slut shaming.

Next.  Heteronormativity and singing about needing a man.  Now, I will grant that Taylor Swift has only publicly dated men and that, when she talks about who inspires her songs, she has only named romantic interests who are men.  But if you just listen to her music, the songs don’t have to be construed that way — many of them use ‘you’ instead of ‘him,’ meaning that, if I want, I can pretend they’re about women.  Just like someone listening to Melissa Etheridge who doesn’t know she’s a lesbian might think her songs could be about men.  To me, the song “Enchanted” is about two girls who meet at a party and don’t know the other’s orientation and flirting and trying to figure it out.  Welcome to Queering Everything 101 with Abigail.

And if you think Taylor Swift only sings love songs, please go find the album Speak Now and listen to it.  Because there are songs about her brother/childhood, about losing innocence, about growing up, about overcoming all odds and the words of others, about friendship, about a million things and they’re brilliant.  Of course they only play the love songs on the radio.  Have you listened to the radio?  Love and sex, it’s pretty much all anyone ever sings about.  Especially sex.

Which brings me to the incredibly frustrating idea that Virginity/Not Sex is Bad.  Fun fact: being celibate is not, in and of itself, sex negative.  Weird, right?  NOT REALLY.  Taylor Swift can be feminine and sweet and wear white dresses and that’s fine.  Other pop stars can be masculine or rude or wear nothing but glitter and a feather or curse like a sailor and that’s fine.  What perpetuates the Virgin/Whore dichotomy is not the women who dress like this or have these images, but the society and the media that tear them apart for it and villainize their every choice.

And the reason I love Taylor Swift’s songs is because they’re not sexual.  I can listen and feel safe.  I don’t know how else to say that.  So much of the music I listen to is overtly sexual, and when it’s not overt, it’s implied.  I can’t listen to the radio without being confronted with you’re asexual and therefore abnormal with every damn song.  I love Taylor Swift’s music because I can identify with it, because it doesn’t alienate me.  It’s not childish to not sing about sex; it’s just not singing about sex.

Celibacy is not inherently slut shaming or sex negative.  Celibacy is not inherently a childish or immature choice.  Celibacy is a personal choice.  Virginity is not something to be ashamed of.  Virgin shaming is just as bad as slut shaming.  Sometimes it is empowering for people to own their sexuality, to be sexy.  And sometimes it’s empowering to not be sexy.

So yeah, maybe Taylor Swift is not feminist.  Maybe she’s not perfect, or even close to being so.  Maybe her music and her image is problematic.  But in a world where nearly every song is a love song and nearly every love song is also a sex song, I take sanctuary in the music that isn’t and that’s okay.